Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency?
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:40:42
Message-Id: 200708051632.36725.bo.andresen@zlin.dk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency? by maxim wexler
1 On Tuesday 17 July 2007 00:46:08 maxim wexler wrote:
2 > So, emerge portage results in one package being
3 > installed, portage, 61kb.
4 >
5 > emerge -u portage lines up 5 or 6 packages plus
6 > portage, 18Mb.
7 >
8 > Went ahead and just did the one package, figuring
9 > later I could do an emerge -u for the rest of it.
10 >
11 > But this is what happens:
12 >
13 > heathen@localhost ~ $ emerge -pv portage
14 >
15 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
16 >
17 > Calculating dependencies... done!
18 > [ebuild R ] sys-apps/portage-2.1.2.9 USE="-build
19 > -doc -epydoc (-selinux)" LINGUAS="-pl" 0 kB
20 >
21 > Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0
22 > kB
23 >
24 > What I expected.
25 >
26 > heathen@localhost ~ $ emerge -puv portage
27 >
28 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
29 >
30 > Calculating dependencies... done!
31 >
32 > Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
33 >
34 > So why doesn't it list the upgrade part now?
35
36 Because --update stops calculating deps when none of the specified targets
37 need updating. Only --deep checks the consistency of all dependencies even
38 when none of the targets need updating. You could argue it's a deficiency in
39 portage (although well-known)..
40
41 --
42 Bo Andresen

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency? Tim Allingham <deserted@×××××××××××.au>
Re: [gentoo-user] portage inconsistency? "Abraham Marín Pérez" <tecnic5@××××××××.com>