| 1 |
On 04/07/13 04:06, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
>On 6 April 2013, at 16:57, Alan Mackenzie wrote: |
| 4 |
>> ... |
| 5 |
>>> Please excuse me, I am running back and forth from the servers and |
| 6 |
>>> typing the error message here. Did our configuration get switched to |
| 7 |
>>> IP6? These are our DB servers and why me!!! Why ME!!!!! |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> No, it's not just you, it's happened to pretty much everybody. udev-200 |
| 10 |
>> now renames eth0, eth1, .... to something else, dependent upon |
| 11 |
>> complicated rules. In my case eth0 has become p6p1, though many people |
| 12 |
>> seem to have got longer names. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> ... |
| 15 |
>> Yes, it's a pain in the backside. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>The irony of it is that AIUI these changes were occasioned because the kernel devs refused to make changes which might renumber the network ports for a very small number of users (who were running, at the time, the very latest generation of Dell or HP servers, less than 6 months old). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>I believe Linus himself was involved and he said "no, no, no! we cannot make changes which will break things!" |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
>Stroller. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Are these new udev rules going across all Linux distros or this is something specific to Gentoo? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Joseph |
Archives