| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Lack of a version number always suggests latest "master" branch. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Good to know. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed |
| 9 |
> to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For all you know, |
| 10 |
> that live ebuild can refer to the master branch of Google's GCC branch, |
| 11 |
> and it might not even build or work correctly as a Gentoo compiler. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Bummer. So why does it show up, when I run "eix -R -3 gcc" if |
| 15 |
it's not gentoo eligible? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
<snip> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) 4.7.2-r51^ms[3] ~9999^ms[3] |
| 20 |
[3] "chromiumos" layman/chromiumos |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So is my best hope the "toolchain" repo ? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Do drop me a short message, if there is a live or 5.1 gcc somewhere. |
| 26 |
I'm itching (really bad) to test RDMA on Cephfs with some in-memory |
| 27 |
codes, on my gentoo_GPU_linux_cluster_hack....... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
thx, |
| 31 |
James |
Archives