| 1 |
Hello Andreas, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016, 12:17:18 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: |
| 4 |
> Am Freitag, 1. Januar 2016, 15:30:37 schrieb Mick: |
| 5 |
> > I am updating an old machine which does not see much usage these |
| 6 |
days. I |
| 7 |
> > came across this blockage, which seems is caused by retaining the |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > pre-Kmail2 KDEPIM version on this PC: |
| 10 |
> Wheee, another kmail1 user. :) |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Don't despair, it will get fixed (since I'm maintaining it and my own |
| 13 |
> machines are blocking too). |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> However, since I'm really busy with other stuff it may sadly take a bit of |
| 16 |
> time. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Meanwhile i use a local mail server (courier-imap). The culprit with kmail2 is |
| 19 |
its bebaviour when it comes to a bigger number of mails (about > 3000) in |
| 20 |
an folder. |
| 21 |
Due courier-imap does not give a UIDNEXT kmail2 re-scans the folders |
| 22 |
(nearly) forever - and i have folders containing > 50000 mails. That takes a |
| 23 |
long time. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I use the same imap acount from differen machines which results in a |
| 26 |
second failure of kmail2. If mails are deleted (there seems to exist a |
| 27 |
threshold of deleted mails) - for example via webmail - kmail2 insists in |
| 28 |
getting invalid mail ids. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> (Backstory, the kde team guys asked me several times if they can go |
| 31 |
ahead |
| 32 |
> with the package move from kde-base to kde-apps, I had no time for |
| 33 |
testing, |
| 34 |
> and at some point I said, just do it, noone except me will notice anyway, |
| 35 |
> and if something goes wrong I'll fix it afterwards...) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Recognized the move also. Had to adapt the package.mask accordingly. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
kind regards |
| 40 |
Petric |
Archives