1 |
This is a shame but the idea coming from Windows world. In Win7/Vista there |
2 |
is a feature called ready boost which I suppose do something similar... or |
3 |
maybe not :) the main goal is to break the bottleneck of the slow HDD, but |
4 |
it is maybe a better idea to put some part of the system on a SDHC card |
5 |
which can reside in my bulting SD slot :) I know, this is also removable :) |
6 |
|
7 |
L: |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
2010/7/1 Albert Hopkins <marduk@×××××××××××.org> |
11 |
|
12 |
> On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 18:06 +0200, Nils Larsson wrote: |
13 |
> > tor 2010-07-01 klockan 08:49 -0700 skrev Bill Longman: |
14 |
> > > On 07/01/2010 08:44 AM, SpaceCake wrote: |
15 |
> > > > So, it solves the first problem, identifiying the device, but how can |
16 |
> I |
17 |
> > > > tell to udev to use always /dev/sds (for example) for this device? |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > You need to have the udev rule or the script that it runs look at |
20 |
> > something specific(the swaplabel for instance). |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > > > I'm thinking how can I instruct udev to turn off swap when the device |
23 |
> is |
24 |
> > > > removed, but this is another story :) |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > I tried doing exactly what you're doing now awhile ago and this is where |
27 |
> > I got stuck, swapoff needs the deivce node(path) to still exist, it |
28 |
> > can't disable swap without it. I could never get swapoff to run before |
29 |
> > udev removed the device node, so I ended up with the system thinking(or |
30 |
> > at least reporting) that it had loads more swap than it actually did. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> This is a bad thing to do. If you have pages swapped out to the device |
33 |
> and you remove the device before putting those pages elsewhere then you |
34 |
> have effectively hosed your system. If it doesn't fail immediately then |
35 |
> as soon as the kernel tries to swap in those pages and finds out the |
36 |
> device it's on can't be accessed then you are in for a world of pain. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> I guess the deeper question (although entirely rhetorical AFAIC) is why |
39 |
> would someone want to swap out to a removable device? |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |