| 1 |
On Thursday 16 November 2006 22:03, Kevin O'Gorman wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm trying to compile a program that works on Solaris with gcc, but |
| 3 |
> won't complile |
| 4 |
> under Linux (either FC5 or Gentoo). It seems to be because writing |
| 5 |
> int errno; |
| 6 |
> works under Solaris gcc-3.4.3 (well, it passes the compiler anyway), |
| 7 |
> but under Linux |
| 8 |
> gcc-3.4.6 or -4.1.0 one has to |
| 9 |
> #include <errno.h> |
| 10 |
> which makes more sense. I would just make the change, but I'm |
| 11 |
> baffled by the error message Linux gcc gives to the first |
| 12 |
> declaration. It reads: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bi |
| 15 |
>n/ld: errno: TLS definition in /lib/libc.so.6 section .tbss mismatches |
| 16 |
> non-TLS reference in /tmp/cc6urgct.o |
| 17 |
> /lib/libc.so.6: could not read symbols: Bad value |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> But when I try to look up TLS, all I get is a bunch of stuff about a |
| 20 |
> server-to-server |
| 21 |
> email security protocol. What is it talking about here, and where |
| 22 |
> can I find out about it? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It would appear to be a an issue between linuxthreads and nptl. How are |
| 25 |
your nptl and nptlonly USE flasg set? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
This post that I find on google may start to give you more answers. It's |
| 28 |
for a completely different package but the problem and solution seesmto |
| 29 |
be the same as yours: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-dev-archive-2006-01/0020.shtml |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
alan |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives