Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr>
To: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-user@l.g.o, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net>, Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht@×××××.fr>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Fwd:How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment?
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 10:51:43
Message-Id: 20140226105129.GC4096@sabayon.logifi
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fwd:How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? by Andrew Savchenko
1 The 21/02/14, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
2
3 > Any decent security setup contains multiple layers of protection.
4 > Use of non-standard binaries, algorithms or implementations is just
5 > one of them and it is the simplest math to prove that security is
6 > _improved_ this way.
7
8 The algorithms and implementations do not change with configuration
9 options while they are almost always the cause of security issues of a
10 software.
11
12 Of course, building the same software on different architectures or with
13 custom configuration options will change the assembler code and the
14 binary fingerprint might be totally different. But considering this a
15 layer of protection remains non-sense and is a dangerous approach. The
16 nature of Gentoo does not help in this area compared to other binary
17 distributions.
18
19 I don't pretend that non-standard binaries NEVER protect against some
20 kind of issues. I pretend they are ridiculously insignificant in the
21 wild.
22
23 --
24 Nicolas Sebrecht