Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: static IP, gateway and netmask setting
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:15:55
Message-Id: 20071126121018.308515d0@pascal.spore.ath.cx
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: static IP, gateway and netmask setting by reader@newsguy.com
1 On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:55:39 -0600
2 reader@×××××××.com wrote:
3
4 > You won't need to stipulate brdcast address in my own experience.
5 > I'm not sure you even need to list the netmask but I always do.
6 > I've never listed broadcast address and have'nt had any problems.
7
8 you don't have to list the broadcast or netmask, if they can be guessed
9 from context. In the case of using a 192.168.x/24 network they can
10 generally both be guessed properly, because that's a Class C private
11 address .
12
13 However, in the case of 10.0.0/24, this may not be true. that is
14 defined as class A private address space, and the networking utilities
15 would probably assume it was 10.0.0/8, a netmask of 255.0.0.0 and a
16 broadcast of 10.255.255.255. That is what ifconfig does at least:
17
18 pascal ~ # ifconfig eth0:1 10.0.0.1
19 pascal ~ # ifconfig eth0:1
20 eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:70:56:2E:CA
21 inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
22 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
23 Interrupt:225 Base address:0xc000
24
25 ifconfig is probably being used to configure your interfaces, unless
26 you switched to iproute2.
27 --
28 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: static IP, gateway and netmask setting Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@×××××××××××××.org>