Archives
Archives
| From: | pk <peterk2@××××××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:27:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E0376AE.3080905@coolmail.se | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | On 2011-06-22 19:36, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > It's a programming language. You know, C, C++, stuff like that. Except |
| 4 | > that it's a zombie-relict from the 1950's that refuses to die because |
| 5 | > people still programming in it are too lazy to learn a proper, more |
| 6 | > modern language :-P |
| 7 | |
| 8 | It refuses to die because it's still very useful in certain niche areas |
| 9 | (hpc, numerical computing etc.) where "modern" languages doesn't cut |
| 10 | it... :-) |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Best regards |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Peter K |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Re: Do we have to build gcc with fortran now? | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> |