| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello people! |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Now, I have the same question as this guy: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really |
| 11 |
> couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility power there |
| 12 |
> is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrophic power |
| 13 |
> loss, and/or very fast fsck. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
ISO9660? Read-only, error correction, and have logging go over the |
| 16 |
network to something else. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
(Well, ISO9660 isn't required; any read-only media with a read-only |
| 19 |
filesystem would probably do.) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
:wq |
Archives