1 |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:26:46PM +0000, Stroller wrote: |
2 |
> I don't think this is a problem. I would love to know what others |
3 |
> think of the `smartctl` output: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> root@sysresccd /root % smartctl -H /dev/sda |
7 |
> smartctl version 5.38 [i486-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce |
8 |
> Allen |
9 |
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/ |
10 |
> |
11 |
> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === |
12 |
> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED |
13 |
> Please note the following marginal Attributes: |
14 |
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE |
15 |
> UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE |
16 |
> 9 Power_On_Seconds 0x0012 001 001 020 Old_age |
17 |
> Always FAILING_NOW 44803h+12m+16s |
18 |
|
19 |
You can always run the smart long-test to double check. The |
20 |
FAILING_NOW just indicates that the normalised value falls below the |
21 |
threshold. For Power_On_Seconds, this usually just indicates that your |
22 |
are way pass the warranty. If you really care about your data, swap it |
23 |
out now or make frequent backups. Otherwise I don't see the harm of |
24 |
keeping it until it actually dies. |
25 |
|
26 |
Cheers, |
27 |
|
28 |
W |
29 |
-- |
30 |
Willie W. Wong wwong@××××××××××××××.edu |
31 |
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire |
32 |
et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton |