Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] eclean ... won't
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:34:27
Message-Id: c02850ab-9443-d2ca-c456-2f758ad7c217@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] eclean ... won't by "J. Roeleveld"
1 J. Roeleveld wrote:
2 > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 05:07:03 PM Константин wrote:
3 >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 01:35:46PM +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
4 >>> On Sunday 20 Nov 2016 16:05:29 Константин wrote:
5 >>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 09:42:40AM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:
6 >>>>> Maybe you need to use 'eclean-dist -d'. But, for your safe, use
7 >>>>> 'eclean-dist -dp' first.
8 >>>> BTW what troubles can I get from 'eclean-dist -d' ? As far as I
9 >>>> understand it, re-download needed tar.gz will be the worst isn't it?
10 >>> You'd think so, wouldn't you? But recently something has been going wrong
11 >>> here such that 'eclean-pkg -d' removed every single package, leaving just
12 >>> the directory structure. That was just after I'd spent six hours building
13 >>> them
14 >> Don't take me wrong it was not an objection but just a question. There
15 >> are a lot of warnigns, but no explanations except 'users will not be
16 >> protected in case they need to downgrade a package or re-install a
17 >> previously removed package.' or similar.
18 >>
19 >> And thanks for example.
20 > One example where this can be annoying is with packages that have fetch-
21 > restriction enabled. Or, even worse, where certain versions are no longer
22 > available for download.
23 >
24 > --
25 > Joost
26 >
27 >
28
29
30 For those, you can use this option.
31
32 -f, --fetch-restricted protect fetch-restricted files (--deep only)
33
34 It only works with -d is the only problem I see with it. It would be
35 nice if it would work for all of them.
36
37 Dale
38
39 :-) :-)