Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 17:01:29
Message-Id: CA+2pebtHzGGherqWCiwy-geyCq_n9doiM4L3f-90fX7BXtHJKA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails by Volker Armin Hemmann
1 I have no surefire solution, but so far everyone and their $PET seems
2 to have taken for granted that your toolchain is just fine and sane.
3 Perhaps "emerge -e @system" (without ccache, distcc or other
4 distractions) would jiggle those bits again?
5
6 --
7 Arttu V.
8
9 On 5/19/12, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote:
10 > Am Montag, 14. Mai 2012, 19:46:39 schrieb Dale:
11 >> Alan McKinnon wrote:
12 >> > On Mon, 14 May 2012 12:13:18 -0500
13 >> >
14 >> > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
15 >> >> For example: Alan, Mike, Pandu, Mark, Neil and me are the top posters
16 >> >> on this list.
17 >> >
18 >> > Yo Dale,
19 >> >
20 >> > You might want to re-calibrate your stats engine :-)
21 >> >
22 >> > I've been quiet for a while (getting old...)[1] and fifty bucks says
23 >> > Michael, Canek, Pandu and a couple more have all posted more than me
24 >> > this year
25 >> >
26 >> > [1] Well, that's my story and I'm sticking with it
27 >>
28 >> Maybe like me, you blabber more than you think:
29 >>
30 >> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-user-per-year.xml
31 >>
32 >> I didn't put them in any certain order but you have fallen a bit tho.
33 >> Someone put alum in your water or something?
34 >>
35 >>
36 >
37 > while I am somehow glad to be part of the Top 20 since 2005, I am even more
38 >
39 > happy, that I am not a regular Top5 poster.
40 >
41 >
42 >
43 > --
44 > #163933
45 >
46 >