Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] NFS server broken again :(
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 01:37:14
Message-Id: CAOdo=Sxe1+fT9C4C89R5KGg1UkprrAJRbxa9tLt0Zmyt_x-Q3Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] NFS server broken again :( by Rich Freeman
1 On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >>
4 >> Do you have an example of a service that uses "After=" but doesn't
5 >> need a "Requires=" or a "Wants="? I'm either being unimaginative or
6 >> plain dumb, but I can't think of any.
7 >
8 > sshd.service
9
10 Thanks. I've just looked at this one and it has "After=syslog.target
11 network.target auditd.service".
12
13 AIUI, "After=network.target" (and similarly "After=syslog.target") is
14 equivalent to having "Wants=network.service NetworkManager.service
15 <other_network_managers>" and "After=network.service
16 NetworkManager.service <other_network_managers>".
17
18 But "After=auditd.service" is clearly an example of an "After="
19 without a "Requires=" or a "Wants=". Thanks again.
20
21 PS: You'd expressed an desire for a dependency chain file in an
22 earlier email. "systemctl list-dependencies" shows you the current
23 dependency resolution. It's not what you were looking for but possibly
24 something of interest (it has modifiers like "--after" and
25 "--before").

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] NFS server broken again :( Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>