Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Indi <thebeelzebubtrigger@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] libreoffice versus bison-2.5
Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 22:12:46
Message-Id: 20110522221108.GA16775@gaurahari.merseine.nu
1 On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:40:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > Apparently, though unproven, at 20:26 on Sunday 22 May 2011, Indi did opine
3 > thusly:
4 >
5 > > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 08:10:02PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
6 > > > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:38 on Sunday 22 May 2011, Indi did
7 > > > opine
8 > > >
9 > > > thusly:
10 > > > > It's unfortunate that we don't have small, fast, light, standalone
11 > > > > programs to deal with the formats of word, excel, powerpoint, etc but
12 > > > > if we did odds are most people would shun them for a big, bloaty
13 > > > > office suite anyway. Personally, I'd love it if I could open and edit
14 > > > > those office formats in vim...
15 > > >
16 > > > What makes you think they don't *already* exist?
17 > >
18 > > The fact that none of your examples fit the bill.
19 >
20 > s/the/my/
21 >
22 > there you go. Fixed that little oversight you made there.
23 >
24
25 Expressing my opinion is not an "oversighjt", and I'm sorry you're so
26 defensive that you can't even tolerate opinions which aren't yours so
27 you have to "correct" them. Maybe you should just filter me out.
28
29 --
30 Caveat utilitor,
31 ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
32 Elaine "Indulekha" Sharpe

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [HEADSUP] [FIXED] libreoffice versus bison-2.5 David Abbott <david@×××××××××.com>