1 |
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Paul Hartman |
2 |
<paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with |
6 |
>> the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the |
7 |
>> middle of an overdue emerge --update --deep --newuse @world, though. |
8 |
>> (And I saw it was complaining about 19 blockers...) It may be overdue |
9 |
>> for a depclean and some other maintenance. I haven't tweaked things |
10 |
>> much, as it's my last functioning Gentoo box until I get kaylee and |
11 |
>> inara fixed. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> It looks like the file uses arithmetic coding, which has legal |
14 |
> restrictions (patents, licensing, blah), which means many jpeg |
15 |
> implementations do not support it. That probably is why it works in |
16 |
> some places and not in others. You should pretty much always use |
17 |
> Huffman coding instead of Arithmetic coding if you're using the images |
18 |
> on the internet or sharing them with others. The image quality is not |
19 |
> affected by this choice, only the way the data is stored in the file. |
20 |
> The file size will be slightly larger using Huffman, but in most cases |
21 |
> only barely larger. |
22 |
|
23 |
I'm familiar with the difference between Huffman and arithmetic[1]. I |
24 |
don't recall seeing any options for managing it, though. I'd have to |
25 |
check to find out what USE flags I've got enabled that might be |
26 |
involved. Also surprising that Windows 7 won't process it. |
27 |
|
28 |
[1] Side effect of having a crazy compression geek for a friend and |
29 |
coworker. I think he finally got around to trying my suggestion of |
30 |
saving off the deflate window state for seekable .tar.gz files. |
31 |
-- |
32 |
:wq |