| 1 |
On 02/08/13 19:17, Tanstaafl wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2013-08-01 7:27 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Something like |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> olympus ~ # cat /etc/portage/package.mask |
| 6 |
>>> =sys-fs/udev-180 |
| 7 |
>> ... |
| 8 |
>> olympus ~ # |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> olympus ~ # grep udev /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 11 |
>> sys-fs/eudev ~amd64 |
| 12 |
>> =virtual/udev-206 ~amd64 |
| 13 |
>> olympus ~ # |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> unmerge everything udev && emerge eudev |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> its been much less fuss and bother than trying to stick with the udev |
| 18 |
>> machinations - I have maybe 15 machines and vm's running eudev, no udev |
| 19 |
>> ... :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks Bill... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Two questions... |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> 1. Why =virtual/udev-206 ~amd64 instead of virtual/udev ~amd64 ? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> and |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> 2. Did you remove the udev-postmount init script? |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
1. I'm lazy - was probably a cut n paste :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
2. I am interested in this one as the message is ambiguous - I have |
| 35 |
removed it on some machines. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
BillK |
Archives