1 |
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:09:52 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> >> Necessary? Don't know but is meant to spare the SSD too much r/w |
4 |
> >> strain. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > How? By spanning an LVM across the two, you have no control over |
7 |
> > which is written to the most. I'd put / on the SSD then mount |
8 |
> > write-heavy directories, like /var and /home, on the SD card. I'd |
9 |
> > also set $PORTDIR to /var/portage (/usr is a daft place to put the |
10 |
> > portage tree anyway). |
11 |
> |
12 |
> That's what I have, I think, sda1 is /boot approx 50M , sda2 is / |
13 |
> approx 1G, then the rest of the SSD is spanned with the SD card, |
14 |
> approx 11G, and committed to /usr /home /opt /var and /tmp just as in |
15 |
> the gentoo doc LVM2. |
16 |
|
17 |
How does that spare the SSD when frequently written directories, |
18 |
like /var and /usr/portage on partially on the SSD? If you want to keep |
19 |
them off the SSD, you must not use LVM like this. |
20 |
|
21 |
Forget LVM, forget a separate /boot, just stick / on the SSD and mount |
22 |
the likes of /var on the SD card. I use LVM on my Eee, but that's because |
23 |
it has two SSDs, I wouldn't dream of including the SD card in there. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Neil Bothwick |
28 |
|
29 |
C&W music backward: get yer dog, wife, job, truck, kids, and sobriety |
30 |
back. |