1 |
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 15:48:26 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
2 |
> On Dienstag 09 Juni 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > Definitely. |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > I have to beat users over the head (metaphorically) with a stick to get |
7 |
> > them to use my mirror. They somehow have the idea that SRC_URI has better |
8 |
> > quality bits than my ftp server... |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > By going to SRC_URI every time, they use up precious international |
11 |
> > bandwidth instead of local (of which there is heaps). Every six months, |
12 |
> > when Fedora or Ubuntu does a release, those users can saturate the entire |
13 |
> > pipe into this *country* - just to get isos that I already have publicly |
14 |
> > available and am begging them to use. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> my university has a nice volume cap for all students. But everything |
17 |
> downloaded from its own network - including the ftp servers is 'free' - |
18 |
> only outside traffic counts. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Luckily, my university hosts a major gentoo mirror. Not rsync, but |
21 |
> distfiles. They also have ubuntu, suse, fedora stuff. Windows updates.. and |
22 |
> still people don't use it. Annoying. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'm six hours behind every mirror I sync - all major distros, every free BSD I |
25 |
can find and every major project out there; the only thing that lags is Ubuntu |
26 |
and Fedora at release time. And give it away at local prices over ftp, http, |
27 |
rsync |
28 |
|
29 |
Why? The company has 2000 employees. The international bandwidth bill is |
30 |
larger than the salary bill - including bonuses, expense claims, subsidies... |
31 |
|
32 |
So management is very very happy that I have a way to reduce that, and rather |
33 |
unhappy that users don't use it more |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |