Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild?
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:37:33
Message-Id: AANLkTinas-3Ol-DR3XlPgbBiblyS8_I07U0ePxOMReWi@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Patch via perl script in an ebuild? by "Arttu V."
1 >> David, you mentioned in the bug that you couldn't get the patch to
2 >> work clean.  I thought you got it working before when you posted the
3 >> patched Typemap for me to download.  Did it work then but not now?
4 >>
5 >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305621
6 >
7 > Ah, I didn't know you had this already mostly figured out in a bug.
8 > Full disclosure requested -- from the very beginning! :D
9
10 My mistake, I apologize.
11
12 > After taking a quick peek: do those ebuilds succeed in installing
13 > something? Since they don't follow CPAN conventions (esp. wrt naming)
14 > I'm not sure what perl-module.eclass actually does for their
15 > src_compile, src_install and other steps. Also, the "->" used in SRC
16 > might have interesting side-effects to paths, as the tarball name no
17 > longer matches its content directory's name.
18 >
19 > --
20 > Arttu V. -- Running Gentoo is like running with scissors
21
22 The google-api-adwords-perl ebuild in the bug works great for me so
23 far. I've only done basic testing with it, but it appears to be
24 working. I will be able to do more extensive testing hopefully over
25 the next few days.
26
27 - Grant