1 |
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 18:12:07 GMT Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> |
3 |
wrote: |
4 |
> > I've been seeing some confusion recently about the abbreviations e.g. |
5 |
> > and |
6 |
> > i.e. Their meanings are: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > E.g. Exempli gratia - Latin for "for the sake of example"; |
9 |
> > I.e. Id est - Latin for "that is". |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Well, as long as we're explaining grammar, I'll elaborate a tiny bit |
12 |
> more since a lot of people (including native English speakers) get |
13 |
> these wrong. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> e.g is used when giving one example when many could have used. |
16 |
|
17 |
Could have used ... what? |
18 |
|
19 |
You're just repeating the definition of "example". |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Peter. |