| 1 |
Mick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 06 Oct 2011 20:42:43 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 10/06/2011 04:20 AM, Jonas de Buhr wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> most of the "oh it's so weird"-whining often comes from just not being |
| 6 |
>>>> used to it. flip your door lock upside down - you'll hate it with |
| 7 |
>>>> passion for a week and then you won't even notice. flip it again and |
| 8 |
>>>> the process will repeat. |
| 9 |
>>> But if someone else snuck into your house and flipped your locks every |
| 10 |
>>> week? |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> This one change won't be catastrophic, but I will probably spend a good |
| 13 |
>>> eight hours researching, testing, implementing, and documenting it. In |
| 14 |
>>> the end, *if everything goes according to plan*, stuff will work exactly |
| 15 |
>>> how it does now. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> If Grub were the only package to do this -- fine, whatever. But next |
| 18 |
>>> week it will be something else. I don't know what my point is, but it |
| 19 |
>>> feels good to bitch about it. |
| 20 |
>> This is how I feel about the initramfs thingy and /usr and /var. What |
| 21 |
>> is next? I am pretty sure it will be something tho. |
| 22 |
> I share your pain. :-( |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I'm not sure if this a sign of me getting (even) older, or Linux maturing and |
| 25 |
> in doing so it caters less and less for Gentoo geeky users and more and more |
| 26 |
> for mainstream ignoramuses. :p |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I was thinking more like windoze really. If windoze starts having mount |
| 30 |
points like Linux, things could start changing. ^_^ Think about it, |
| 31 |
windoze currently has to have its stuff on the C drive and Linux can be |
| 32 |
spread out over many drives and you can mount things wherever you want. |
| 33 |
Linux is going the way of windoze then windoze would be going the way of |
| 34 |
Linux. Weird huh? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Dale |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
:-) :-) |
Archives