Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:09:50
Message-Id: 4DE6AA07.9030801@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files by Todd Goodman
1 Todd Goodman wrote:
2 > * David W Noon<dwnoon@××××××××.com> [110601 14:41]:
3 >
4 >> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Todd Goodman wrote about Re:
5 >> [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:
6 >>
7 >>
8 >>> What you seem to ignore or miss in the discussion is that an
9 >>> emerge -C is necessary at times during an upgrade and rebuild when
10 >>> package dependencies are not perfect.
11 >>>
12 >> See my follow-up to Volker Armin Hemmann on this.
13 >> --
14 >> Regards,
15 >>
16 >> Dave [RLU #314465]
17 >> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
18 >> dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon)
19 >> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
20 >>
21 > It's not a rare situation as you imply in that followup and
22 > copying off/backing up and then restoring is a lot of busywork and
23 > fraught with risk when the current situation works just fine, thank you
24 > very much.
25 >
26 > If the current situation is unacceptable to you, why not create a patch
27 > and work to get it approved?
28 >
29 > Please make it optional with the default being the existing behavior.
30 >
31 > Todd
32 >
33
34 +1. Me, I like the idea but don't want it to be the default option. If
35 -CC won't work, then let it be some other option that can be added to
36 -C. I just know that the vast majority of the time, I do NOT want my
37 config files deleted. I wouldn't mind having the option available but
38 just not the default.
39
40 Dale
41
42 :-) :-)