1 |
Todd Goodman wrote: |
2 |
> * David W Noon<dwnoon@××××××××.com> [110601 14:41]: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:20:02 +0200, Todd Goodman wrote about Re: |
5 |
>> [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> What you seem to ignore or miss in the discussion is that an |
9 |
>>> emerge -C is necessary at times during an upgrade and rebuild when |
10 |
>>> package dependencies are not perfect. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> See my follow-up to Volker Armin Hemmann on this. |
13 |
>> -- |
14 |
>> Regards, |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Dave [RLU #314465] |
17 |
>> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
18 |
>> dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon) |
19 |
>> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
20 |
>> |
21 |
> It's not a rare situation as you imply in that followup and |
22 |
> copying off/backing up and then restoring is a lot of busywork and |
23 |
> fraught with risk when the current situation works just fine, thank you |
24 |
> very much. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> If the current situation is unacceptable to you, why not create a patch |
27 |
> and work to get it approved? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Please make it optional with the default being the existing behavior. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Todd |
32 |
> |
33 |
|
34 |
+1. Me, I like the idea but don't want it to be the default option. If |
35 |
-CC won't work, then let it be some other option that can be added to |
36 |
-C. I just know that the vast majority of the time, I do NOT want my |
37 |
config files deleted. I wouldn't mind having the option available but |
38 |
just not the default. |
39 |
|
40 |
Dale |
41 |
|
42 |
:-) :-) |