| 1 |
luis jure wrote: |
| 2 |
> on 2013-07-19 at 01:56 Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> Do you really want to put /home on a SSD? |
| 5 |
> well, not actually the whole /home, the SSD is too small for that. i'm not |
| 6 |
> sure yet, i might keep /home on a HDD and mount the partition on the SSD as |
| 7 |
> a directory under /home for some special uses. or the other way around... |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Size was one issue I thought of but I was more concerned with the wear |
| 13 |
and tear part but that was explained by others. It seems that is not as |
| 14 |
much a issue any more. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
At one time, I had a /data directory. I stored large stuff there: |
| 17 |
camera pics, videos, audio stuff and such. If you put /home on SSD, you |
| 18 |
could always put the larger stuff on another mount point. One thing |
| 19 |
about Linux, you can mount stuff wherever you want. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Post back how it works out and any speed improvements you see. I'm |
| 22 |
really curious since I would like to get one that is at least big enough |
| 23 |
for the OS itself. My /home is over 1Tb, that is Tb too. I'm not buying |
| 24 |
one big enough for all that. lol |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Dale |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
:-) :-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives