1 |
On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Alan McKinnon <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote |
2 |
about 'Re: SOLVED: Recover from LVM errors? (Was: Re: [gentoo-user] Help - |
3 |
system reboots while compiling)': |
4 |
> All in all, the odds are tipping in favour of ext4 |
5 |
|
6 |
I don't need quite such large filesystems as my largest is just under 4TB, |
7 |
and my system will probably max out around 7TB, but I need a filesystem |
8 |
that is maintained (Namesys had basically abandoned reiserfs in favor of |
9 |
reiser4 well before Hans' current troubles started), and has good |
10 |
all-around performance characteristics (I have both large source trees, |
11 |
invloving a multitude of directories and small-ish files AND a |
12 |
video "library" containing very large files in my /home). I would also |
13 |
like to see some support for the "tail packing" of resiserfs -- It's not |
14 |
that important, but last I checked one saved over 100MB by the portage |
15 |
tree on reiserfs AND mini-benchmarks like emerge --sync and |
16 |
find '/usr/portage' > /dev/null actually ran faster than ext3. |
17 |
|
18 |
That said, I'm very encouraged about ext4, and will probably migrate some |
19 |
unimportant data over to that filesystem in near future and perform my own |
20 |
bonnie++ tests. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. |
24 |
bss03@××××××××××.net ((_/)o o(\_)) |
25 |
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' |
26 |
http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/ |