Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ext4 - grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block <BLOCKID>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:57:30
Message-Id: CAEH5T2Mpi2r015zUVaCEjOObOeps2V6tRq4ydeV2kfO8cEuB2Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: ext4 - grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block by James Broadhead
1 On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James Broadhead
2 <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> ext4: "fill_buffer on unknown block <BLOCKID> out of range"
5 >
6 > Apologies; the correct message is:
7 > grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device sdb1
8 >
9 > This appears 42 times immediately following mount.
10 >
11 > Running picasa today, it informed me that one of the files I was
12 > working with was corrupted (but put the message in a box too small to
13 > read the full path).
14 >
15 > This makes me think that perhaps the disk is bad.  Any advice, aside
16 > from the usual "get your data off asap"?
17
18 Does it happen to be a >2TB USB drive? I remember reading about
19 problems with some of those. It works in Windows with the factory
20 partition/FAT tables because of tricks they do to the addressing that
21 works in Windows, but once you reformat it you can't access the >2TB
22 areas. Something like that... As far as I recall, you could
23 repartition to create a 2TB or smaller partition and that would work,
24 but then the rest of the drive was inaccessible.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ext4 - grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block <BLOCKID> James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com>