Archives
Archives
| From: | Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. | ||
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2014 18:23:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 53D3F218.8040905@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. by Nikos Chantziaras |
||
| 1 | Am 26.07.2014 19:58, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: |
| 2 | > On 26/07/14 20:39, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
| 3 | >> [...] |
| 4 | >> and this, my children, is why I am using ECC ram. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > I don't really care if the porn I'm watching has one frame with |
| 7 | > corrupted pixels on it. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | |
| 12 | but you will care when your kernel writes the next file right over the |
| 13 | partition boundary. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ECC-ram, it is worth it. | "Marc Stürmer" <mail@×××××××××××××.de> |