| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:26:24PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 25.03.2011 22:13, schrieb Matt Harrison: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:09:23PM +0100, Sebastian Be?ler wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >> Mail encryption is, as far as I know, something that works on the |
| 6 |
> >> client-side only. The mail server doesn't see the encryption, |
| 7 |
> >> encrypted mails contain only text, just like every other mail. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > amavis-new supports signing all outgoing mails with a gpg signature, |
| 10 |
> > not that I think it's very relevant to the OP's question. I just |
| 11 |
> > wanted to chime in asI haven't posted here in a while :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> As I said, as far as I know. |
| 14 |
> I haven't used amavis in years so that I was not aware of this. |
| 15 |
> But mail signing and mail encrypting are two absolutly differend pair of |
| 16 |
> shoes. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Greetings |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Sebastian Be?ler |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> PS: The key you use for signing is expired. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I believe it can encrypt as well, as long as they keys are supplied previously for the |
| 26 |
recipients. And thanks for pointing out my expired key, strangely mutt nor gpg |
| 27 |
complained about using it for quite a while now. Even stranger, you're the first |
| 28 |
person who has noticed or told me :o |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Matt |
Archives