1 |
On 03/27/10 21:17, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
2 |
> On 03/28/2010 02:40 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
3 |
>> Some ffmpeg-using applications (e.g. mplayer) allow you to pass |
4 |
>> numbers of threads (e.g. I use 6 on my Core-I7) to ffmpeg; others |
5 |
>> (e.g. chromium) do not. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> First, mplayer uses its own bundled ffmpeg. It doesn't use |
8 |
> media-video/ffmpeg at all. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Furthermore, this is not what the "threads" USE flag does for |
11 |
> ffmpeg. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
Thank you for replying!!! |
16 |
|
17 |
What would you guess the "threads" parameter is for ffmpeg? I've not |
18 |
found an explanation, and thought it might be the author catching up |
19 |
with Alexander Strange. |
20 |
|
21 |
<http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-doc.html> |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
> Those applications that allow you to specify an amount of threads |
25 |
> assume you're using ffmpeg-mt instead of normal ffmpeg. ffmpeg-mt is |
26 |
> a fork of ffmpeg and is not in Portage because it's still considered |
27 |
> non-stable upstream. |
28 |
|
29 |
> There's an ebuild in Gentoo Bugzilla for ffmpeg-mt and an mplayer |
30 |
> that uses ffmpeg-mt as its bundled ffmpeg version. The mt mplayer |
31 |
> ebuild can also be found in the wirelay overlay (it's in layman.) |
32 |
|
33 |
AH! I had switched from bugzilla to the overlay for mplayer (thank you for |
34 |
providing it); but was unaware that ffmpeg-mt had a separate ebuild. |
35 |
Where is it, please? |
36 |
|
37 |
So the same question, then, for ffmpeg-mt; if I replace ffmpeg with |
38 |
ffmpeg-mt after setting a default of 6, can you imagine any problems |
39 |
(other than it is not stable)? |
40 |
|
41 |
Thanks for the help! |