1 |
Grant wrote: |
2 |
>>>>> # emerge -avDuN system |
3 |
>>>>> [snip] |
4 |
>>>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-auth/pambase-20081028" have |
5 |
>>>>> been masked. |
6 |
>>>>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
7 |
>>>>> request: |
8 |
>>>>> - sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r1 (masked by: EAPI 4) |
9 |
>>>>> - sys-auth/pambase-20101024 (masked by: EAPI 3) |
10 |
>>>> |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>>> USE="-pam" emerge @system will avoid that particular block, although it |
13 |
>>>> may only get you as far as the next one. |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> I seem to get an error like this from whatever I try to emerge. Is |
17 |
>>> untarring a stage3 my only option? |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>>> - Grant |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> You don't have to do the entire stage3 at once, |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/ |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> has precompiled packages for the major arches and profiles. You could try to |
27 |
>> replace just pambase, pam, python, etc. -- whatever's giving you trouble. |
28 |
>> |
29 |
>> This was not my first recommendation because I've managed to break e.g. |
30 |
>> `tar` and `cp` before in the attempt at which point you have two rescues to |
31 |
>> attempt. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> The errors I'm getting seem to be complaining about emerging ebuilds |
34 |
> with a higher EAPI number than my portage has. Should I just install |
35 |
> the latest portage binary package? If so, how should I do that? |
36 |
> |
37 |
> - Grant |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
Only because I had to do this once myself. |
43 |
|
44 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/manually-fixing-portage.xml |
45 |
|
46 |
Hope that helps. |
47 |
|
48 |
Dale |
49 |
|
50 |
:-) :-) |
51 |
|
52 |
-- |
53 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
54 |
how you interpreted my words! |
55 |
|
56 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
57 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |