| 1 |
On 12/05/2022 02:41, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: |
| 2 |
> And yes, the compile time is one of the factors in not wanting it on |
| 3 |
> my system. The second factor is a natural reaction toward feeling that |
| 4 |
> I am forced to have it. |
| 5 |
> Another reason is the growing collection of compilers and development |
| 6 |
> tools and their build time (gcc, bin-utils, llvm, clang ... etc.) and |
| 7 |
> now rust. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Tongue in cheek, but have you tried doing away with gcc, clang etc? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you're going to use a source-based system, a bunch of compilers |
| 12 |
"comes with the territory". |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Many people see Rust as a "better C than C", so that's why it's becoming |
| 15 |
popular. (Oh, and does Rust have its own compiler, or is Rust just part |
| 16 |
of llvm?). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The way things are going you might find all you need is the llvm |
| 19 |
collection, and gcc will be obsolete ... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Cheers, |
| 22 |
Wol |
Archives