1 |
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:56:31 -0500 |
2 |
Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 2014-02-21 10:28 AM, Gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:03:47 -0500 |
6 |
> > Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> >> On 2014-02-21 8:54 AM, Daniel Campbell <lists@××××××××.us> wrote: |
9 |
> >>> If you think all profit is the same, then we are talking on two |
10 |
> >>> different wavelengths. |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> I didn't say that. I said that *everyone* operates under the profit |
13 |
> >> motive. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > And that is simply not true. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Yes, it is, but you may be confused about the meaning of 'profit'. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Even someone who volunteers in the local soup kitchen feeding the |
20 |
> homeless is doing so under the profit motive. The things is, the |
21 |
> 'profit' involved (may) only involve(s) a 'warm fuzzy good feeling'. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If you read my previous words |
24 |
|
25 |
Yes, I did. But now, I stop to do so just as have done with Canek |
26 |
before. |