1 |
daid kahl wrote: |
2 |
>> I could take a whole day typing in exactly what I do, |
3 |
>> but I assumed the otherwise intelligent subscribers to the list |
4 |
>> would realise that I add '-1' to those pkgs which are not in 'world'. |
5 |
>> My 'world' file contains 112 entries, incl 28 'sys' + 35 'kde'. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Really, does something like that need spelling out (tries to smile) ? |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> It probably doesn't, but since this thread has gotten slightly hot, |
11 |
> I'll only insult myself here. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I forget to add 1 a lot more than I should, and as a result my world |
14 |
> file is probably full of pollution. This isn't to say I don't clean |
15 |
> it out from time to time, but in theory people are just posting |
16 |
> reminders to be sure you weren't forgetting yourself -- I know I'm |
17 |
> guilty of it sometimes. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> On that note, I'd like to ask a question I was going to post or email |
20 |
> about. Can I comment the world file. More interestingly, is there a |
21 |
> way to pass portage a comment to stick in world above the package? |
22 |
> This would be really damn useful. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> For example, sometimes I'm testing things, and I really do mean to |
25 |
> install a package without oneshot. But I might be installing a bunch |
26 |
> of things to try to get some third-party dependencies resolved, and |
27 |
> later I don't need all them (or I'd like to know why I put it |
28 |
> there!!). |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Thoughts? |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Regards, |
33 |
> daid |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
I think there was a time when there was no -1 option. At least I didn't |
37 |
use it at first. Anyway, glad to hear you are using the option |
38 |
correctly, most of the time anyway. ;-) You have about the same size |
39 |
world file as me. |
40 |
|
41 |
Packages installed: 1205 |
42 |
Packages in world: 106 |
43 |
Packages in system: 50 |
44 |
Required packages: 1205 |
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
I haven't cleaned mine out in a while tho. It's possible a couple could |
48 |
have slipped in there. |
49 |
|
50 |
I to would like to know if comments are permitted in the world file. |
51 |
The only thing is, some geek has portage putting things in alphabetical |
52 |
order. I'm not sure how that would work. Would portage put them all in |
53 |
order or would they even be able to stay with the package the comment |
54 |
goes with? |
55 |
|
56 |
Interesting. |
57 |
|
58 |
Dale |
59 |
|
60 |
:-) :-) |