| 1 |
On 01/04/13 01:01, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway" |
| 7 |
>> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the |
| 8 |
>> same behavior... |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Rgds, |
| 11 |
>> -- |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I synced yesterday and I didn't see the news alert. Last eudev update |
| 15 |
> was in Feb. so I *guess* not. It seems to be a "udev" thing. That is |
| 16 |
> why I mentioned eudev to someone else that was having this issue with a |
| 17 |
> server setup. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Dale |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> :-) :-) |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Have not seen it yet (eudev), but something interesting is I am moving |
| 25 |
to a small cloud of libvirt managed vm instances for my services and |
| 26 |
instead of having to delete the net rules file in each instance (because |
| 27 |
the mac address is changing) it creates a new eth0 for the new mac |
| 28 |
address, and moved the old to eth1 - handy as I am using a base image |
| 29 |
and spawning off a child from a snap for each instance - one less |
| 30 |
annoyance to worry about! Seemed to happen about the time of the last |
| 31 |
eudev update, need to look into it more. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
BillK |
Archives