| 1 |
În ziua de duminică, 7 ianuarie 2018, la 03:09:32 EET, Mart Raudsepp a scris: |
| 2 |
> > To me this reads as readline-7.0_p3 depends on libs from readline- |
| 3 |
> > 6.3. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Smells a bit as some sort of bug. Try rebuilding readline? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > This didn't happen here when readline was bumped. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This is no bug here. It's just storing the fact that it preserved these |
| 10 |
> /lib64/libreadline.so.6{,.3} under the replacing newer version package. |
| 11 |
> That is, readline-7.0_p3 now owns these files, but based on this |
| 12 |
> registry, they will be deleted and removed from its CONTENTS, once |
| 13 |
> there are no more consumers of it based on essentially NEEDED.ELF.2 |
| 14 |
> contents in the VDB (/var/db/pkg/*/*/NEEDED.ELF.2). |
| 15 |
> That is, what is keeping them from being removed is not stored in this |
| 16 |
> registry. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks for the in-depth explanation. Do you think that revdep-rebuild would've |
| 19 |
helped here? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And a bit off-topic for this thread (but it's a subject that interests me): |
| 22 |
does the preserved rebuild feature track user installed programs (outside of |
| 23 |
portage control)? |
Archives