1 |
just use |
2 |
|
3 |
video=vesafb:1024x768 |
4 |
|
5 |
:) justin |
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:44:39 +0800, "Chuanwen Wu" <wcw8410@×××××.com> |
10 |
wrote: |
11 |
> Hi, guys! |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I want to have higher resolution in console. I used vesa-tng before |
14 |
> and now I have update the kernel to 2.6.23 and I guess I should use |
15 |
> uvesafb instead of vesa-tng. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I have followed the guide here |
18 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/uvesafb/, and |
19 |
> Here is the options I have chose in config file about the "FB" thing: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> CONFIG_FB=y |
22 |
> CONFIG_FB_DDC=y |
23 |
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y |
24 |
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y |
25 |
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y |
26 |
> CONFIG_FB_DEFERRED_IO=y |
27 |
> CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y |
28 |
> CONFIG_FB_UVESA=y |
29 |
> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y |
30 |
> CONFIG_FB_INTEL=y |
31 |
> CONFIG_FB_INTEL_I2C=y |
32 |
> |
33 |
> and in the menu.lst file, I append "video=uvesafb:1024x768" (PS: I |
34 |
> have tried "video=uvesafb:1024x768-32" and some other similar |
35 |
> parameter, too) to the kernel command line. |
36 |
> But after I rebooted, the resolution was still very low, which I |
37 |
> guess was 800x640, and I couldn't see anything changed. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> PS: My machine is Dell 1400 laptop and use x86_64 arch. I use |
40 |
> tuxonice-sources and I have also tried gentoo-source to test the |
41 |
> uvesafb. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Any help is appreciated! |
44 |
> -- |
45 |
> wcw |
46 |
> -- |
47 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
48 |
|
49 |
-- |
50 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |