| 1 |
On 2013-03-31, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Pandu Poluan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Since it's obvious that upsteam has this "my way or the highway" |
| 7 |
>> mentality, I'm curious about whether eudev (and mdev) exhibits the |
| 8 |
>> same behavior... |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I synced yesterday and I didn't see the news alert. Last eudev update |
| 12 |
> was in Feb. so I *guess* not. It seems to be a "udev" thing. That is |
| 13 |
> why I mentioned eudev to someone else that was having this issue with a |
| 14 |
> server setup. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I'd guess eudev will eventually do the same, although I hope that, it |
| 17 |
being a separate codebase, makes it easier to adopt some solution like |
| 18 |
the old rule generator, instead of using udev's approach. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The udev upstream may have its issues, but there's actually a point in |
| 21 |
removing this, the approach there was so far was just a dirty hack. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Nuno Silva (aka njsg) |
| 25 |
http://njsg.sdf-eu.org/ |
Archives