Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Difference between --update and --emptytree? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:19:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201303311619.06718.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Difference between --update and --emptytree? by Walter Dnes |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 31 March 2013 14:09:56 Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > I keep a previous version of the kernel (gentoo-sources) as a fallback, |
| 4 | > and --depclean wants to remove that, which I want to keep. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | if you let it unmerge the old kernel it will only remove the sources. |
| 7 | Everything that's generated by building the kernel will be left alone. Would |
| 8 | that suit you? It's what I do here, anyway: |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Peter |