1 |
Am 04.05.2014 21:22, schrieb J. Roeleveld: |
2 |
> On Sunday, May 04, 2014 09:03:08 PM Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
>> People run KVM-hosts with storage on ZFS ... nice with the |
5 |
>> snapshots etc ... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Does KVM support running snapshots? Eg. also storing the memory and |
8 |
> registers? I have not found any indication that KVM supports that. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Without that, KVM is useless to me. |
11 |
|
12 |
KVM != ZFS ... you could use ZFS with other hypervisors. |
13 |
|
14 |
AFAI understand you can take snapshots using libvirt (which in turn |
15 |
controls the underlying qemu-kvm etc). |
16 |
|
17 |
> I thought the MBR info that's possible with GPT would make it |
18 |
> possible with any BIOS? Provided the /boot partition is early enough |
19 |
> on the disk. |
20 |
|
21 |
I had no separate /boot ... just sda1 as "BIOS boot partition", |
22 |
unformatted and with partition type ef02 (and sda2 as my gentoo-root). |
23 |
|
24 |
>> I also wanted to partition the SSD according to the Erase Block |
25 |
>> Size of 6144 kB by this way ... dunno if this is still needed or |
26 |
>> has any real speed benefits. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Again, I would expect current tools should do that automagically? |
29 |
|
30 |
Maybe. |
31 |
|
32 |
>> Maybe I take another approach to migrate to UEFI/GPT in the next |
33 |
>> days, now that I have my rsynced filesystems at hand (I got rid of |
34 |
>> more LVs and stuff so it gets pretty slim now). |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Less LVs is simpler. More is more flexible. |
37 |
|
38 |
Exactly. But it was time to clean up a bit. |
39 |
|
40 |
>>> booting works from BIOS/MBR. |
41 |
>> |
42 |
>> ... if your BIOS isn't crappy ;-) |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Try updating? :) |
45 |
|
46 |
Never found an update for this box. |
47 |
|
48 |
-> DMI: Hewlett-Packard HP Elite 7300 Series MT/2AB5, BIOS 7.12 10/12/2011 |
49 |
|
50 |
hints welcome ;-) |
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
> Seriously, do you have the following: |
54 |
> |
55 |
> *** # man gdisk artemis ~ # gdisk -l /dev/sda GPT fdisk (gdisk) |
56 |
> version 0.8.8 |
57 |
> |
58 |
> Partition table scan: MBR: protective |
59 |
> |
60 |
> *** |
61 |
> |
62 |
> That last line of what I copied is the bit that should make it |
63 |
> possible. |
64 |
> |
65 |
> Also, the /boot partition needs to have the mbr-boot flag (or |
66 |
> whatever it's called) enabled. |
67 |
|
68 |
Thanks, but I had that as well ... I will skip that stuff and try going |
69 |
the UEFI-way later this day, if my customers allow ... |
70 |
|
71 |
Stefan |