1 |
Well, I found the old binaries in my backups and did the deed, the only |
2 |
problems, was that the old data directory did not contain any .conf |
3 |
files, so I copied the new ones into the old data directory and it was |
4 |
then happy. I m not sure what happened to the .conf files in the old |
5 |
data directory, but they had not been there for quite a while, so maybe |
6 |
this was a problem with the arlier beta. Very strange but it looks |
7 |
good. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thanks for your help. |
10 |
|
11 |
Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
12 |
|
13 |
> Well... then we need someone, who is more professional, since AFAIK |
14 |
> multiple postgresql's can be on one system in several slots. Maybe (as it |
15 |
> is beta, slots are the same, therefore new deletes old and vice versa)? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> 2014-11-10 16:47 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
18 |
> |
19 |
> > What it does then is delete the beta3 and give me only beta2. This is |
20 |
> > what I had done to fix my original problem, I can show you the build log |
21 |
> > for beta3 if that would help. I am using gentoo-unstable, but that |
22 |
> > should be obvious. |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > > You updated your beta2 with beta3. Now you can add beta2 again by emerge |
27 |
> > > =dev-db/posgresql-9.4-beta2 (or something like) |
28 |
> > > |
29 |
> > > 2014-11-10 16:36 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
30 |
> > > |
31 |
> > > > Well, after the emerge, no sign of beta2 anywhere, I have the directory |
32 |
> > > > /usr/lib64/postgresql-9.4/ with the beta3 binaries and that is all, is |
33 |
> > > > there a problem with the ebuilds or something? |
34 |
> > > > |
35 |
> > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
36 |
> > > > |
37 |
> > > > > Well, emerge it again :). You can have two postgresql-servers in |
38 |
> > > > different |
39 |
> > > > > slots. |
40 |
> > > > > |
41 |
> > > > > 2014-11-10 16:21 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
42 |
> > > > > |
43 |
> > > > > > However, when I emerge beta3, beta2 is gone, so this is my problem. |
44 |
> > > > > > |
45 |
> > > > > > |
46 |
> > > > > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
47 |
> > > > > > |
48 |
> > > > > > > Yes. You emerge both beta2 and beta3, then run pg_upgrade for |
49 |
> > beta3, |
50 |
> > > > > > > provide BOTH binaries to it, it converts the base. Then you can |
51 |
> > > > delete |
52 |
> > > > > > > beta2. |
53 |
> > > > > > > |
54 |
> > > > > > > 2014-11-10 16:04 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
55 |
> > > > > > > |
56 |
> > > > > > > > Hi. I have a puzzle regarding upgrading postgresql. In my |
57 |
> > recent |
58 |
> > > > > > world |
59 |
> > > > > > > > update I went from 9.4_beta2 to beta3, but when I tried to |
60 |
> > start |
61 |
> > > > the |
62 |
> > > > > > > > server, it complained that the databases were written with a |
63 |
> > > > different |
64 |
> > > > > > > > "catalog version" -- whatever that is, and the pg_upgrade tool |
65 |
> > > > requires |
66 |
> > > > > > > > both old and new binaries to actually upgrade the database. |
67 |
> > So as |
68 |
> > > > a |
69 |
> > > > > > > > temporary measure, I went back to beta2 and things worked |
70 |
> > again. |
71 |
> > > > So |
72 |
> > > > > > > > what the heck are you supposed to do here, I like pg, but this |
73 |
> > is |
74 |
> > > > very |
75 |
> > > > > > > > strange to me. |
76 |
> > > > > > > > |
77 |
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. |
78 |
> > > > > > > > |
79 |
> > > > > > > > -- |
80 |
> > > > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The |
81 |
> > question |
82 |
> > > > is: |
83 |
> > > > > > > > How do |
84 |
> > > > > > > > you spend it? |
85 |
> > > > > > > > |
86 |
> > > > > > > > John Covici |
87 |
> > > > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
88 |
> > > > > > > > |
89 |
> > > > > > > > |
90 |
> > > > > > > |
91 |
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
92 |
> > > > > > > Alternatives: |
93 |
> > > > > > > |
94 |
> > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
95 |
> > > > > > |
96 |
> > > > > > -- |
97 |
> > > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question |
98 |
> > is: |
99 |
> > > > > > How do |
100 |
> > > > > > you spend it? |
101 |
> > > > > > |
102 |
> > > > > > John Covici |
103 |
> > > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
104 |
> > > > > > |
105 |
> > > > > > |
106 |
> > > > > |
107 |
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
108 |
> > > > > Alternatives: |
109 |
> > > > > |
110 |
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
111 |
> > > > |
112 |
> > > > -- |
113 |
> > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
114 |
> > > > How do |
115 |
> > > > you spend it? |
116 |
> > > > |
117 |
> > > > John Covici |
118 |
> > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
119 |
> > > > |
120 |
> > > > |
121 |
> > > |
122 |
> > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
123 |
> > > Alternatives: |
124 |
> > > |
125 |
> > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
126 |
> > |
127 |
> > -- |
128 |
> > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
129 |
> > How do |
130 |
> > you spend it? |
131 |
> > |
132 |
> > John Covici |
133 |
> > covici@××××××××××.com |
134 |
> > |
135 |
> > |
136 |
> |
137 |
> ---------------------------------------------------- |
138 |
> Alternatives: |
139 |
> |
140 |
> ---------------------------------------------------- |
141 |
|
142 |
-- |
143 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
144 |
How do |
145 |
you spend it? |
146 |
|
147 |
John Covici |
148 |
covici@××××××××××.com |