1 |
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:46:19 +0200 (CEST), Helmut Jarausch wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> E.g. here is the complete output of |
4 |
> emerge --tree --update --deep --pretend world |
5 |
> |
6 |
> These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Calculating dependencies ... done! |
9 |
> |
10 |
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy |
11 |
> ">=app-admin/system-tools-backends-1.3.0" have been masked. !!! One of |
12 |
> the following masked packages is required to complete your request: |
13 |
> - app-admin/system-tools-backends-2.6.0-r1 (masked by: package.mask) |
14 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
15 |
> # Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> (24 Jan 2008) |
16 |
> # add masked gnome-system-tools-2.20 and dependencies |
17 |
> # for testing purpose |
18 |
> |
19 |
> - app-admin/system-tools-backends-2.4.2 (masked by: package.mask) |
20 |
> - app-admin/system-tools-backends-1.4.2-r1 (masked by: package.mask) |
21 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask: |
22 |
> # Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> (12 Apr 2008) |
23 |
> # Masking gnome-system-tools because it is broken, |
24 |
> # to help fix it, see bug #214265 |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
emerge normally tells you the package that requires the masked |
28 |
dependency. Does adding --verbose give any more detail? |
29 |
|
30 |
Do you have anything in /etc/portage/package.unmask that may affect this? |
31 |
If not, you have found a bug in the tree, because non-masked packages |
32 |
shouldn't depend on masked ones. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Neil Bothwick |
37 |
|
38 |
This screen intentionally left blank. |