1 |
On Wednesday 25 June 2008, Chris Walters wrote: |
2 |
> | This is the point where I start to ask for a citation and stop |
3 |
> | listening to theoretical possibilities and things that might |
4 |
> | possibly could be. Unless of course the exact meaning of phrases |
5 |
> | like "three hundred thousand million years" has a different meaning |
6 |
> | in your universe than it does in mine. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Whom are you asking for a citation from? |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm asking you to back up your totally unsubstantiated assertions that |
11 |
the NSA et al can rapidly crack decent cryptography |
12 |
|
13 |
> For which particular facts? |
14 |
|
15 |
Pick any one you like from your contribution to this thread. My |
16 |
favourite would be this one: |
17 |
|
18 |
"A final thought: It is a fact that both the US Navy and the NSA are |
19 |
*very* |
20 |
interested in cryptology and data security. The NSA also does have |
21 |
large |
22 |
networks of supercomputers that, using parallel, distributed or |
23 |
concurrent |
24 |
computing principles can crack keys more quickly than you may think." |
25 |
|
26 |
Now that's a pretty definite statement you made there. So, how quickly |
27 |
do you think I think they can do it? And how quickly can they actually |
28 |
do it? |
29 |
|
30 |
> Do you really doubt that the US NSA has a *lot* of supercomputers? |
31 |
|
32 |
Not at all, in fact I would hazard an educated guess that the NSA is the |
33 |
largest consumer of supercomputers in the world, and also that they are |
34 |
very reluctant to advertise the fact. I doubt any of their machines |
35 |
appear on the Top500 list. |
36 |
|
37 |
I say this as a natural deduction from knowing what they are mandated to |
38 |
do and how they would realistically go about doing it. |
39 |
|
40 |
> Do you really doubt that they have experts in mathematics, |
41 |
> cryptology, cryptanalysis, and cryptography experts on staff? |
42 |
|
43 |
Not at all, I would be stupid indeed to doubt that. As evidence, one |
44 |
only has to look at the vast amount of technical literature the NSA has |
45 |
published on the subject. |
46 |
|
47 |
> Or |
48 |
> perhaps you doubt that they can crack any keys at all... |
49 |
|
50 |
Don't get smart with me, jackass. |
51 |
|
52 |
Everyone here who knows a bit about cryptography knows that give enough |
53 |
time and resources any key can be cracked. |
54 |
|
55 |
I asked you to do a perfectly reasonable thing. You are asserting that |
56 |
the NSA can crack keys quickly, much quicker than the average geek |
57 |
thinks they can do it, but you provide no evidence of this other than |
58 |
your own assertion of it. You didn't even give any evidence of why I |
59 |
should consider you a credible and knowledgeable person in the field. |
60 |
Extraordinary assertions require extraordinary evidence and all that. |
61 |
|
62 |
I see 4 scenarios here: |
63 |
|
64 |
1. You are perfectly correct and can back it up. In which case I'd like |
65 |
to read the evidence. |
66 |
2. You are perfectly correct and have the evidence but cannot show it to |
67 |
me due to national security or NDA. That's fine, but do say so. |
68 |
3. You are presenting your knowledgeable hunch/gut feel/opinion/hearsay |
69 |
evidence as fact. that's also fine, but do say so. |
70 |
4. You are simply making stuff up in varying degrees. |
71 |
|
72 |
-- |
73 |
Alan McKinnon |
74 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
75 |
|
76 |
-- |
77 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |