1 |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 18:19:02 Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
>> Again, thanks Alan. The second pass through finished up and the same |
4 |
>> offending package (apparently e2fsprogs-libs ?) was still listed so |
5 |
>> erasing the preserved_libs_registry file and using revdep-rebuild -i |
6 |
>> suggests that the machine is clean again. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> Cheers, |
9 |
>> Mark |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> >>> Auto-cleaning packages... |
12 |
>> >>> |
13 |
>> >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> * Regenerating GNU info directory index... |
16 |
>> * Processed 122 info files. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> !!! existing preserved libs: |
19 |
>> >>> package: sys-libs/e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9 |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> * - /lib/libblkid.so |
22 |
>> * used by /bin/mount (sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1) |
23 |
>> * used by /bin/umount (sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1) |
24 |
>> * used by /sbin/blkid (sys-apps/util-linux-2.16.1) |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> An easy way to check if things are OK is to run ldd on each of the "used by" |
28 |
> files. None of them should list "Not found". If they do, portage has gotten |
29 |
> itself confused and it's records are out of sync with reality. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> There's not much portage can do about this as the problem is really with the |
32 |
> ebuilds |
33 |
> |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
36 |
|
37 |
Thanks. I'll star this conversation and try to remember that advice in |
38 |
the future. Problem was the first time around it listed 3 or 4 and |
39 |
then stated "and 362 others..." but didn't give the names. Clearly |
40 |
something was confused! |
41 |
|
42 |
Cheers, |
43 |
Mark |