1 |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 09:00:38AM +0200, n952162 wrote: |
2 |
> On 2020-08-31 23:52, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:02:34PM +0200, n952162 wrote: |
4 |
> > > In all of the imagemagick display installations I have, when I use the |
5 |
> > > image edit draw function, it includes an opaque background, rather than |
6 |
> > > just the lines themselves. I've never had this with display(1) before, |
7 |
> > First you use draw, which is used in convert, and then you speak of display. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Please see the attached menu capture for "Image Edit ..." |
10 |
> […] |
11 |
> If you left-click on the window, you get a menu that allows the full |
12 |
> range of editing capabilities. |
13 |
|
14 |
Ah, I forgot about that (never used it), sorry. |
15 |
|
16 |
> > Drawing is done on a canvas. So unless you start with an existing image file |
17 |
> > as a basis, IM needs to pick a default background colour, which in your case |
18 |
> > seems to be black. |
19 |
|
20 |
> |
21 |
> Yes, the problem is, I AM using an existing image. Usually, with IM's |
22 |
> display(1), I could add lines and text to images but now, all of a |
23 |
> sudden, it uses a bounding box around the new strokes, choosing a single |
24 |
> random color from the background. |
25 |
|
26 |
Hm… When I select Edit → Annotate → Background, I can select transparent. |
27 |
Unfortunately, I’m currently not on Gentoo and couldn’t find out on the spot |
28 |
how to get the compile options for my Arch-based ImageMagick. |
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
32 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
33 |
|
34 |
“The mating dance is a courtship ritual. You do it to woo and win. |
35 |
I wooed. I won. I’m done.” – Earl Sinclair (Dinosaurs Ep. 2) |