Archives
Archives
| From: | James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-user] Re: FhGFS or BeeGFS on Gentoo? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:31:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | loom.20140915T202826-978@post.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] FhGFS or BeeGFS on Gentoo? by James |
||
| 1 | James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | > Any "brave souls" put FhGFS on a gentoo system? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Oops, I forgot the most interesting link of all. [1] |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | James |
| 13 | |
| 14 | [1] http://moo.nac.uci.edu/~hjm/fhgfs_vs_gluster.html |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Re: FhGFS or BeeGFS on Gentoo? | "J. Roeleveld" <joost@××××××××.org> |