From: | "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@×××××.at> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression | ||
Date: | Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:46:59 | ||
Message-Id: | 53BA96B8.2000303@xunil.at | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] btrfs: subvol without compression by Marc Joliet |
1 | Am 20.06.2014 12:07, schrieb Marc Joliet: |
2 | |
3 | > From my own google search, at least up to 2011 per-subvolume |
4 | > compression settings were not possible. Then, after subsequently |
5 | > searching on the btrfs wiki for a while, I finally found an answer: |
6 | > no. See this FAQ entry: |
7 | > |
8 | > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_I_mount_subvolumes_with_different_mount_options.3F |
9 | > |
10 | > [...] |
11 | |
12 | This seems to be the same for the option nodatacow. |
13 | |
14 | I wanted to test this with VM-images in a separate subvolume, and with |
15 | this script: |
16 | |
17 | https://github.com/stsquad/scripts/blob/master/uncow.py |
18 | |
19 | It was mentioned here: |
20 | |
21 | https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Can_copy-on-write_be_turned_off_for_data_blocks.3F |
22 | |
23 | Does somebody already have experience with turning off COW for |
24 | specific files like VM images? |
25 | |
26 | I would like to take 2 demo VMs with me on my thinkpad, and there I |
27 | don't have that much flexibility to add another hdd w/ ext4 or something. |
28 | |
29 | As far as I have seen so far, for demoing the performance isn't too |
30 | bad anyway. |
31 | |
32 | Stefan |