1 |
"Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Is there a reason to use i486 stage3? I think an i686 one might have |
4 |
> been available and a better hit if your system is/was set up as an i686 |
5 |
> before this? Well, not that it counts now, gotta go with what you have |
6 |
> unpacked. |
7 |
|
8 |
Looking at those stages again... it is not apparent in any way that I |
9 |
should have gotten something besides x86. |
10 |
|
11 |
I see there is an i686. But apparently I was to slow to figure out |
12 |
that I needed it. |
13 |
|
14 |
Thanks ... I'm working thru the CHOST doc now. |