Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: ddjones <ddjones@××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] libgpod comment bug
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:51:56
Message-Id: 1746213.d03m82Eh6d@kushiel
1 I'm reemerging Amarok after adding the ipod flag and libgpod fails to install
2 due to bug 537968.
3
4 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=537968
5
6 There's a patch for the bug, which I've copied, but it's not being applied:
7
8 root@kushiel /etc/portage/patches/media-libs/libgpod # cat libgpod-swig-
9 comment-fix.patch
10 --- bindings/python/gpod.i.in.orig 2015-06-20 23:15:41.000000000 -0700
11 +++ bindings/python/gpod.i.in 2015-06-20 23:16:28.000000000 -0700
12 @@ -298,9 +298,9 @@
13 %include "gpod_doc.i"
14 %include "@top_builddir@/config.h"
15
16 -# be nicer to decode these utf8 strings into Unicode objects in the C
17 -# layer. Here we are leaving it to the Python side, and just giving
18 -# them utf8 encoded Strings.
19 +// be nicer to decode these utf8 strings into Unicode objects in the C
20 +// layer. Here we are leaving it to the Python side, and just giving
21 +// them utf8 encoded Strings.
22 typedef char gchar;
23
24 %typemap(in) time_t {
25
26
27
28 I'm using the instructions found here:
29
30 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349707#c11
31
32 However, it doesn't look like portage is even recognizing the patch:
33
34 >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libgpod-0.8.3/work
35 >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/media-
36 libs/libgpod-0.8.3/work/libgpod-0.8.3 ...
37 >>> Source prepared.
38
39 Any hints or suggestions on what I'm doing wrong?
40
41 --
42 "People who think they're generous to a fault usually think that's their only
43 fault." - Sidney J. Harris

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] libgpod comment bug David Abbott <dabbott@g.o>