1 |
Am 20.10.2014 um 01:34 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
2 |
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann |
3 |
> <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> Am 19.10.2014 um 20:56 schrieb Rich Freeman: |
5 |
>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, James <wireless@×××××××××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>>> As far as docs go - what specifically is unclear? Systemd is rapidly |
7 |
>>> evolving so things do get out of date, but for the most part stuff |
8 |
>>> like this can be found in man systemd.exec and such. Lennart's series |
9 |
>>> of blog posts on system administration using systemd is a very good |
10 |
>>> place to start. -- Rich |
11 |
>> and you are fine with that? That the package that becomes Pid1 is such |
12 |
>> an unstable, ever involving mess that not even the docs are keeping up |
13 |
>> with it? |
14 |
> If I wasn't fine with it I'd hardly be running Gentoo. :) You just |
15 |
> described half of the distro, though it isn't changing as rapidly as |
16 |
> it used to. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Most of the issues are in the init scripts, which technically aren't |
19 |
> really part of systemd. It is fairly immature everywhere. If you |
20 |
> want a really stable experience then you should probably stick with |
21 |
> RHEL or Debian Stable. :) |
22 |
> |
23 |
>> You just gave me another reason not to use systemd. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> Sounds like you didn't really need one. It is a free country - you're |
26 |
> no more required to run systemd than any Gentoo developer is required |
27 |
> to fix openrc init scripts or systemd units... |
28 |
> |
29 |
> -- |
30 |
> Rich |
31 |
> |
32 |
> . |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
you make that sound like a threat. But that does not work with me ;) |
36 |
|
37 |
I have dealt with Slackware in the past. Had no probs back then, why |
38 |
should I be scared now? |