1 |
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:00:39 +0200 |
3 |
> Joerg.Schilling@××××××××××××××××.de (Joerg Schilling) wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> "b.n." <brullonulla@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> > Daniel Iliev ha scritto: |
8 |
>> > > How about if you remake your site and explain everything there. |
9 |
>> > > What happened (chronologically and in detail) and provide |
10 |
>> > > evidence. Remake it to be clear with simple sentences and easy |
11 |
>> > > for finding the information. Then provide means (as web forum, |
12 |
>> > > mailing list etc) for the visitors to post their comments and |
13 |
>> > > questions. After all that is ready it would absolutely acceptable |
14 |
>> > > to participate in this and every other public list as a normal |
15 |
>> > > member and put links to your site in your signature. |
16 |
>> > > |
17 |
>> > > How about that? |
18 |
>> > |
19 |
>> > I want that too. I back the proposal of Iliev. Joerg, why don't you |
20 |
>> > do that so that you can settle all this in the most informative way |
21 |
>> > possible? |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> I pointed you to the FAQ and I asked you to tell me what questions |
24 |
>> remain unanswered. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Sorry, never saw the message in which you ask what more info to |
28 |
> publish. Perhaps I didn't receive it. |
29 |
> |
30 |
>> |
31 |
>> I am sorry but I can only extend information if people tell me which |
32 |
>> information they like to see. |
33 |
>> |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Actually you can figure out which are the most FAQ from this thread, but |
36 |
> let me help you for the start. Please, publish detailed information |
37 |
> for the following events in chronological order: |
38 |
> |
39 |
> - When the first contact with the attackers took place and what was |
40 |
> the reason for that contact |
41 |
> |
42 |
> - When the first attack took place and what (you suppose if you don't |
43 |
> know for sure) was the reason for the attack. Describe the attack |
44 |
> itself - what were the actions of those who attacked you |
45 |
> |
46 |
> - When other attacks (if any) took place. Describe them. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> - When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why |
49 |
> there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the |
50 |
> most interesting part) |
51 |
> |
52 |
> - When the fork was launched |
53 |
> |
54 |
> - The exact statement of the lawyers you consulted |
55 |
> |
56 |
> - Any evidence (e-mails, posts to web forums, blogs, |
57 |
> publications, etc) or reference to that evidence that you can |
58 |
> provide |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> That's what I could think off for the moment, but I'm sure others |
62 |
> will fill in the gaps I've left. |
63 |
> |
64 |
|
65 |
Let me add: do not only *describe*. Post all *sources* that you have. |
66 |
Emails, chats, whatever. Otherwise it's just your word vs someone |
67 |
else, and we cannot decide. Give people the *facts*, and everything |
68 |
will come up by itself. |
69 |
|
70 |
m. |
71 |
-- |
72 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |